PortfoliosLab logo
GIGB vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between GIGB and ^GSPC is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

GIGB vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (GIGB) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GIGB:

0.75

^GSPC:

0.44

Sortino Ratio

GIGB:

1.10

^GSPC:

0.79

Omega Ratio

GIGB:

1.14

^GSPC:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

GIGB:

0.39

^GSPC:

0.48

Martin Ratio

GIGB:

2.22

^GSPC:

1.85

Ulcer Index

GIGB:

2.11%

^GSPC:

4.92%

Daily Std Dev

GIGB:

6.24%

^GSPC:

19.37%

Max Drawdown

GIGB:

-22.25%

^GSPC:

-56.78%

Current Drawdown

GIGB:

-7.12%

^GSPC:

-7.88%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIGB achieves a 1.47% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's -3.77% return.


GIGB

YTD

1.47%

1M

1.61%

6M

-0.11%

1Y

4.97%

5Y*

0.46%

10Y*

N/A

^GSPC

YTD

-3.77%

1M

7.44%

6M

-5.60%

1Y

8.37%

5Y*

14.12%

10Y*

10.46%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GIGB vs. ^GSPC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIGB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GIGB is 6666
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GIGB is 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GIGB is 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GIGB is 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GIGB is 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GIGB is 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^GSPC is 6767
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GIGB vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (GIGB) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current GIGB Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is higher than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIGB and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Drawdowns

GIGB vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIGB drawdown since its inception was -22.25%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIGB and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

GIGB vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (GIGB) is 2.45%, while S&P 500 (^GSPC) has a volatility of 6.82%. This indicates that GIGB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...